Finger, L., van den Bogaert, V., Schmidt, L., Fleischer, J., Stadtler, M., Sommer, K., & Wirth, J. (2023). The science of citizen science: a systematic literature review on educational and scientific outcomes. Front. Educ., 8, 1226529. Open Access
Stadtler, M. & Schuster, C. (2023). Experimentelle Herangehensweisen an die Evaluation von Maßnahmen der Wissenschaftskommunikation [Experimental approaches to the evaluation of science communication measures]. In P. Niemann, V. van den Bogaert & R. Ziegler (Eds.), Evaluationsmethoden der Wissenschaftskommunikation (pp. 293-304). Springer. Open Access
Stebner, F., Schuster, C., Weber, X.-L., Greiff, S., Leutner, D., & Wirth, J. (2022). Transfer of metacognitive skills in self-regulated learning: effects on strategy application and content knowledge acquisition. Metacognition and Learning, 17, 715-744. doi:10.1007/s11409-022-09322-x Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Weber, X., Schuster, C., Göritz, S., & Stebner, F. (2022). Prüfungssituationen neu denken. Das Zusammenspiel zwischen Lernprozess, Lernprodukt und Prüfungssituation [Rethinking exam situations. The interplay between learning process, learning product and examination situation]. In S.-I. Beutel, T. Bohl, K. Bräu, A. Feindt, T. Häcker, & B. Wischer (Eds.), Leistung: ermöglichen und beurteilen (pp. 80-82). Friedrich Jahresheft 2022. Open Access
Scharrer, L., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2021). Information Easiness Affects Non-experts’ Evaluation of Scientific Claims About Which They Hold Prior Beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 3757. Open Access
Braasch, J. L. G., & Scharrer, L. (2020). The role of cognitive conflict in understanding and learning from multiple perspectives. In P. N. Van Meter, A. List, D. Lombardi, & P. Kendeou (Eds.), Handbook of learning from multiple representations and perspectives (pp. 205-222). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429443961-15 Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Stadtler, M. (2020). Non scholae, sed vitae discimus: Zur Erfassung von Kompetenzen und Wissen im Schülerlabor [Non scholae, sed vitae discimus: On the acquisition of competencies and knowledge in the student lab]. In: K. Sommer, J. Wirth & M. Vanderbeke (Eds.), Handbuch Forschen im Schülerlabor. Theoretische Grundlagen, empirische Forschungsmethoden und aktuelle Anwendungsgebiete (pp. 119-126). Waxmann. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Macedo-Rouet, M., Potocki, A., Scharrer, L., Ros, C., Stadtler, M., Salmerón, L., & Rouet, J.-F. (2019). How good is this page? Benefits and limits of prompting on adolescents’ evaluation of Web information quality. Reading Research Quarterly, 54, 299-321. doi:10.1002/rrq.241 Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Macedo-Rouet, M., Salmerón, L., Ros, C., Pérez, A., Stadtler, M., & Rouet, J.-F. (2019). Are frequent users of social network sites good information evaluators? An investigation of adolescents’ sourcing abilities. Journal for the Study of Development and Education, 43(1), 101-138. doi:10.1080/02103702.2019.1690849 Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Potocki, A., de Pereyra, G., Ros, C., Macedo-Rouet, M., Stadtler, M., Salmerón, L., & Rouet, J.-F. (2019). The development of source evaluation skills during adolescence: exploring different levels of source processing and their relationships. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 43(1). 19-59. doi:10.1080/02103702.2019.1690848 Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Scharrer, L., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2019). Biased recipients encounter biased sources: Effect of ethical (dis-)agreement between reader and author on evaluating scientific claims. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 1165-1177. doi:10.1002/acp.3563 Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Bromme, R., Stadtler, M., & Scharrer, L. (2018). The provenance of certainty: Multiple source use and the public engagement with science. In: J. L. G. Braasch, I. Bråten, & M. T. McCrudden (Eds.), Handbook of multiple source use (pp. 269-284). Routledge. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Salmerón, L., Strømsø, H. I., Kammerer, Y., Stadtler, M., & van den Broek, P. (2018). Comprehension processes in digital reading. In Paul van den Broek et al. (Eds.), Learning to read in a digital world (pp. 91-120). John Benjamins. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Stadtler, M., Bromme, R., & Rouet, J.-F. (2018). Learning from multiple documents: How can we foster multiple document literacy skills in a sustainable way? In E. Manalo, Y. Uesaka, & C. Chinn (Eds.), Promoting spontaneous use of learning and reasoning strategies: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 46-61). Routledge. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Bråten, I., Stadtler, M., & Salmerón, L. (2017). The role of sourcing in discourse comprehension. In M. Schober, D. N. Rapp & M. A. Britt (Eds.), Handbook of Discourse Processes (pp. 141-168).Taylor & Francis. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Stadtler, M., Winter, S., Scharrer, L., Thomm, E., Krämer, N., & Bromme, R. (2017). Selektion, Integration und Evaluation: Wie wir das Internet nutzen, wenn wir uns über Wissenschaft informieren wollen [Selection, integration and evaluation: how we use the Internet when we want to learn about science]. Psychologische Rundschau, 68, 177-181. doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000361 Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Bromme, R., Kienhues, D., & Stadtler, M. (2016). Die kognitive Arbeitsteilung als Herausforderung der Forschung zu epistemischen Überzeugungen [The cognitive division of labor as a challenge to research on epistemic beliefs]. In A.-K. Mayer & T. Rosman (Eds.), Denken über Wissen und Wissenschaft. Epistemologische Überzeugungen als Gegenstand psychologischer Forschung (pp. 25-38). Pabst Science Publishers. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Bromme, R., Scharrer, L., Stadtler, M., Hömberg, J., & Torspecken, R. (2015). Is it believable when it’s scientific? How scientific discourse style influences laypeople’s resolution of conflicts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 36-57. doi:10.1002/tea.21172 Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Stadtler, M., Paul, J., Globoschütz, S., & Bromme, R. (2015). Watch out! - An instruction raising students’ epistemic vigilance augments their sourcing activities. In: D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings, & P. P. Maglio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2278-2283). Cognitive Science Society. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Stadtler, M. & Bromme, R. (2014). The content–source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information. In D. N. Rapp, & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing Inaccurate Information: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives from Cognitive Science and the Educational Sciences (pp. 379-402). MIT Press. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Stadtler, M., Bromme, R., & Rouet, J.-F. (2014). „Science meets Reading“: Worin bestehen die Kompetenzen zum Lesen multipler Dokumente zu Wissenschaftsthemen und wie fördert man sie? [What are the competencies for reading multiple documents on science topics and how do you promote them?]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 42, 55-68. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., & Bromme, R. (2013). How do readers explain the occurrence of conflicts in science texts? Effects of presentation format and source expertise? In M. Knauff, N. Pauen, N. Sebanz & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3448-3453). Cognitive Science Society. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., Brummernhenrich, B., & Bromme, R. (2013). Dealing with uncertainty: Readers’ memory for and use of conflicting information from science texts as function of presentation format and source expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 130-150. doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.769996 Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Scharrer, L., Britt, M.A., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2012). Beyond one’s own understanding: How text comprehensibility affects laypeople’s decision about scientific claims. In N. Miyake, D. Peebles, & R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 965-970). Cognitive Science Society. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., & Bromme, R. (2012). Does relevance matter in comprehending scientific conflicts from multiple documents? Evidence from online and offline-data. In E. de Vries, & K. Scheiter (Eds.), Staging Knowledge and Experience: How to Take Advantage of Representational Technologies in Education and Training? Proceedings of the EARLI SIG 2 Meeting (pp. 202-204). EARLI SIG 2. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Bromme, R., Scharrer, L., Britt, A. M., & Stadtler, M. (2011). Effects of information comprehensibility and argument type on lay recipients’readiness to defer to experts when deciding about scientific knowledge claims. In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2788 -2793). Cognitive Science Society. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., & Bromme, R. (2011). How reading goals and rhetorical signals influence recipients’ recognition of intertextual conflicts. In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1346 -1351). Cognitive Science Society. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Stadtler, M., Bromme, R., & Kettler, S. (2009). Dr. Google - geschätzter Kollege? Die Rolle des Internet in der Arzt-Patient-Kommunikation [Dr. Google - a valued colleague? The role of the Internet in doctor-patient communication]. Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin, 85, 254-259. doi:10.3238/zfa.2009.0254 Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Stadtler, M. & Bromme, R. (2008). Using representational guidance to enhance metacognitive activity when learning on the WWW. In J. Canas (Ed.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognition and the Web (pp. 173-180). Spain. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Stadtler, M. (2006). Auf der Suche nach medizinischen Fachinformationen. Metakognitionen bei der Internetrecherche von Laien [Searching for medical information. Metacognitions in laypersons' Internet research]. Waxmann. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Stahl, E., Bromme, R, Stadtler, M., & Jaron R. (2007). Learning by hypertext writing: effects of considering a single audience versus multiple audiences on knowledge acquisition. In M. Torrance, L. van Waes & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and Cognition: Research and Applications (pp.307-321). Elsevier. doi: 10.1163/9781849508223_021Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Bromme, R. & Stadtler, M. (2005). So much information. But which is important? Which is true? Supporting laypersons' informal learning from science based evidence on the internet. In T. Okamoto, D. Albert, T. Honda, & F. Hesse (Eds.), The 2nd Joint Workshop on Cognition and Learning through Media-Communication for Advanced e-Learning (pp.28-33). Sophia University. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Stadtler, M. & Bromme (2005). Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: The role of metacognition in the formation of documents models. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2068-2073). Erlbaum. doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9015-3 Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
Stadtler, M. & Bromme, R. (2004). Laypersons searching the WWW for medical information: The role of metacognition. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Reiger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1638). Erlbaum. Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
